Text Newstips - 925-800-NEWS
Advertisement
Home » Contra Costa Supervisors Approve Final Environmental Report For Marathon Martinez Biofuel Conversion

Contra Costa Supervisors Approve Final Environmental Report For Marathon Martinez Biofuel Conversion

by CLAYCORD.com
10 comments

In a quick unanimous vote taken before its lunch break Tuesday, the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors approved the final environmental impact report for Marathon Martinez Refinery’s conversion from an oil refinery into one that handles renewable fuels. No one from the public spoke about the project, which was contentious when the board initially signed off on its land permit and initial EIR in May 2022. The following month, environmental groups Communities for a Better Environment and the Center for Biological Diversity filed a lawsuit to block the conversion, challenging what they called “flawed environmental review processes for two giant oil refineries looking to convert from processing crude to producing biofuels from vegetable oil and animal fat feedstocks.” The second refinery was Phillips 66 in Rodeo, planning to undergo a similar transformation that the supervisors also approved, prompting another lawsuit. The county reapproved a new EIR for the Phillips project in January 2024 after the county clarified questions raised by the judge. Once transformed, the Martinez refinery east of Interstate Highway 680 and south of Pacheco Marsh would produce diesel fuel from renewable sources, including rendered fats, soybean and corn oil, and other cooking and vegetable oils.

According to a staff report for Tuesday’s meeting, the judge presiding over the lawsuit concluded the 2022 EIR was adequate on all counts, except for its discussion and deferral of odor mitigation and told the county to reconsider the mitigation measures for odor impacts. New odor sources were identified as organic vapors generated by the storage of renewable feedstock. The new EIR identified ways to mitigate the odor. Marathon will alter and/or replace refinery equipment and install new equipment and tanks. Crude oil processing equipment that can’t be repurposed would be shut down and removed.

Opponents have also said the county wasn’t mitigating other significant environmental problems the project could cause, as well as ones left over by more than 100 years of oil refining at the site. Supervisors acknowledged their concerns in 2022, but said Marathon planned their proposal carefully. They also said helping California convert from fossil fuel consumption to that of renewable diesel fuel took priority — at least to bridge the coming years until all vehicles can run on electricity.

10 Comments

Doesn’t matter if the public speaks or not. The Board of Supervisors decided this a long time ago.
It$ all about the recipro$ity, don’tchknow.

18
1

…. they won’t listen to the public … how much $$ changed hands in that deal? losing that refining brings it to how much CA will lose? to 25 – 30%? $8 / gas? how about $9!

Will Californians Change their Voting Habits when Gas goes to $7 or higher a Gallon or becomes unobtainable? I Hope that some sanity will overcome them!!!!

What would be really great is if people would change their driving habits, and slow down to use less fuel and save money for themselves. Fewer (or no) lead-footed drivers would be a real boon to Californians.

1
4

doesn’t matter, tried that in the 80’s with 55mph speed limit and 85mph speedometers “didn’t make a dent” Remember the Delorean had to get to 88mph to get back to the future with an 85mph speedo 🤣 gas can be $10pergal and people will still buy it….population is too big (and growing) to change anything

no, again and again we vote for new gas tax so no reason to think anyone will use their heads here.

I don’t know how this will affect our local environment, but the conversion is likely to be good for Midwest soybean farmers. Historically, China has been the major buyer of US soybeans; however, in the years after Trump’s first time in the White House and his imposition of tariffs, China has been buying fewer soybeans from the US and more from Brazil and Argentina. That has hurt US soybean farmers who do not have anywhere else to sell their beans in the quantity China used to buy them. So, producing more biodiesel in the US would provide the farmers with another possible market. In addition, most of the used oil the US has used to produce biodiesel has come from China. Owing to questions about the quality of that oil, plus the increased cost due to tariffs, there could now be a bigger market for US soybean farmers. The only stumbling block for this to be a real win for US farmers is that there aren’t enough crushing plants in the US to make the oil in the quantity needed.

https://soygrowers.com/news-releases/soybean-crush-expansion-2025-update/#:~:text=U.S.%20crush%20growth,abilities%20in%20the%20United%20States.

An there IS, an abundance of “raw” materials, enough to sustain the
refinery running at FULL capacity ? ? ? . .
But of course those pushing the project have already furnished PROOF
and whole thing isn’t based on a really slick power point presentation.
I’m skeptical . . . . . . .

no, and I do not see automakers rushing to build diesel cars.

Advertisement

Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter!

Latest News

© Copyright 2007 – 2025 Claycord News & Talk