TEXT NEWSTIPS/PHOTOS - 925-800-NEWS
Advertisement
Home » Carmax Agrees To Multi-County Consumer Protection Settlement For More Than $1M

Carmax Agrees To Multi-County Consumer Protection Settlement For More Than $1M

by CLAYCORD.com
4 comments

The vehicle resale company CarMax agreed to settle a civil lawsuit for over $1 million that was brought by the district attorneys of six California counties alleging violations of state consumer protection laws this week.
The suit was filed in Santa Clara County Superior Court by the counties of San Francisco, Santa Clara, Sonoma, and three in Southern California.
The company agreed to pay $1.1 million, including $900,000 in penalties, to resolve allegations it did not transfer ownership titles of used vehicles within the timeframe required by law, according to a statement from Sonoma County District Attorney Carla Rodriguez.
The other money will cover costs related to the counties’ investigations and to pay for future enforcement of consumer protection laws.
The company did not admit liability and disputed the claims, but agreed to an injunction prohibiting the delay of vehicle title transfers, known as “pink slips” in California because of the color of the paper showing legal ownership of a vehicle.
CarMax, which sells vehicles online and at physical dealerships, cooperated with the investigation and took steps to address any alleged issues before the settlement was finalized, according to San Francisco District Attorney Brooke Jenkins.
The company was accused of failing to transfer the ownership titles within the 30-day window required by law and allegedly was not complying with other deadlines when paperwork bounced back with errors or needed fixing, according to a statement from Jenkins’ office.
Failing to transfer the titles in a timely manner prevents a new owner from proving ownership to refinance, resell, or use the vehicle as collateral for a loan, all of which they are entitled to do under California consumer protection laws.
CarMax agreed to implement internal policies to prevent the issue from recurring, including placing holds on vehicles that the company doesn’t physically have the pink slip for or won’t have a path to get it within the required timeframe.
The company also agreed to ensure smog checks and Vehicle Identification Number verifications are done before reselling a vehicle, ensure it has enough employees to process the ownership titles, and assign a high-level manager responsibility for regional compliance, according to the Sonoma County District Attorney’s Office.

4 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

This has been going on for years and thousands of complaints ….. only $1M penalty?! They’ll keep doing it – it’s drop in the bucket to them

domo,
.
You’ve got that right! It’s considered “the cost of doing business” to a business like Carmax.

7
1

AND THE AMBULENCE CHASERS

And the “ambulance chasers” strike again,

3
1

With the states pocketing 90% of the settlement… they didn’t want to hit Carmax too hard. They
hope and pray Carmax does it again… Easy money! employee bonuses, office parties….
The people who first complained and caused the lawsuit? LMAO… they’re lucky if they get enough
to pay their own lawyers. The states? They’ll ‘save’ some “… to pay for future enforcement of
consumer protection laws.”
CarMax probably deserved what they got… the people they hurt and inconvenienced? Did not!

Advertisement

Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter!

Latest News

© Copyright 2007 – 2025 Claycord News & Talk