An update on the earlier post about the 5 suspects who were arrested for allegedly trying to meet a child for sex. All 5 suspects are no longer in custody, according to county records. They’ve all been released pending charges.
© Copyright 2007 – 2025 Claycord News & Talk
Wow, what a shocker.
Do the people get what they vote for?
No.
The people get what the government wants them to have.
No one to blame but yourselves.
Innocent until prove guilty, dude. That’s not a liberal value. It’s a fundamental basis of our legal system.
Why wasn’t Richard Allen Davis and many other child predators released on the their own recognizance, before their conviction, dude???
Cautiously Informed,
.
The age of Polly Klass, her kidnapping, and her murder changed the circumstances in the Richard Allen Davis case, which isn’t equal to the circumstances in these 5 cases, as there was no kidnapping, no murder, and no minors were actually involved in this sting operation.
Explain to us where you draw the between what a dangerous sexual predator is and what isn’t.
Cautiously Informed,
.
It would require much more information than a press release posted to the Facebook page of the Walnut Creek Police Department.
These people are part of a syndicate that has money, attorneys and the means to pay bail
Your response is a perfect example as to why dangerous liberal politicians like Weaner are in office.
Cautiously Informed,
.
So, you don’t believe in “innocent until proven guilty” or our rights under the U.S. Constitution, you instead believe in GUILT, simply because a government agency issued a press release. As much as I dislike California State Senator Scott Wiener, you are just as dangerous, if not more dangerous, as you claim he is, due to your overwhelming willingness to declare an individual guilty based on a press release, because the government is ALWAYS honest and forthcoming in everything they say, whether it’s said by a government spokesperson or via a press release. It’s good to know that you could never serve on a jury because of your biases and your inability to be impartial. You want to be JUDGE, JURY, AND EXECUTIONER based on a governmental agency issuing a press release.
Here you go again – running your vague flimsy rants based on assumptions.
Cautiously Informed,
.
Hardly vague, flimsy, and/or a rant. My comment is based on the information that you posted. Perhaps you shouldn’t post comments that are quite so vague and flimsy.
Yoyohop,
.
You’re correct!!!
My country, guilty until proven innocent! That’s just the law there.
NO! In this country, you are NOT innocent until proven guilty! You are only innocent if you did not commit the crime.
However, in this Country, you are PRESUMED Innocent until proven guilty within our legal system. That rule does not apply in the Court of Public Opinion.
Cowellian,
.
That’s much like the myth, “You can’t yell fire in a crowded theater.”
Yoyoho
Innocent until proven guilty.
Nice phrase to toss around.
How many parents of children want previously arrested child molesters walking around looking for more children?
The soft-hearted DA should have kept them incarcerated long enough to determine if they are a threat.
Now, they can disappear to perhaps molest again.
And, don’t call me “Dude”.
Abe,
.
Are you just as much to blame?
Black Knight
You bet I am.
I have not worked on making changes.
It’s a task I’ve attempted but failed.
Abe
Ever hear of bail. These folks have money, attorneys and means to pay bail
Wow freaking sickening! I would love to have those perverts go live with the judge or whoever let them all go for life. Child predators have no reason to be let free to go and try to mess up some child’s life forever. California and its laws to help criminals is truly disgusting.
City_Guy,
.
This is from a press release from a government agency, not an adjudicated verdict of guilt in a court. Why are you so willing to believe everything that the government tells you, simply because it came from the government?
I’m glad these men were stopped before actual children were hurt. Pedophilia seems to be quite popular these days, especially among MAGAts. These men will go to jail (as they deserve) while others get voted into office. A sick double standard.
@Michael
“She was 12, I was 30” – Joe Biden
Especially among little girl-sniffing maggots.
Everyone needs to follow the example of: Gary Plauché
Well…… anybody contemplating that had better be sure they are registering their displeasure with the correct persons, there could be several people with the names Andrew Garcia, 32, of Concord
Billie Ray Breland, 29, of Antioch
Rudolf Naused Robl, 42, of Germany
Jacek Markiewicz, 67, of Walnut Creek
Taesu Park, 36, of Marin County
*
Mugshots would be helpful.
Dr. Jellyfinger,
.
You can get a partial look at some of these individuals here.
.
https://www.facebook.com/walnutcreekpd/
.
California law now limits the use of booking photos shared on the social media pages of police departments and sheriff departments.
.
https://california.public.law/codes/penal_code_section_13665
.
.
bet cha they doing it again
SURPRISE, Surprise, surprise
Now Jim Nabors was light in the loafers but I never heard anything about him molesting little boys (tho Ron Howard has said he hated him).
Dr. Jellyfinger,
.
This is from “The Boys,” the Ron Howard and Clint Howard memoir, he wrote: “I wasn’t as close with Jim Nabors, though he was an extremely nice man. It took me until the ’80s, when we did the Return to Mayberry reunion film, for me to discover that Jim was not just this friendly “Gollee!” goofball but a worldly, intelligent guy with whom I would enjoy having conversations.” Later I discovered the crew called Nabors names behind his back. “I didn’t yet understand that there were gay people all around me, and all across the world. But this was my introduction to the very concept of queerness.”
.
Jim Nabors also did an interview where he spoke of having received an unexpected letter from Ron Howard, where he wrote about turning 60 and possibly having a birthday party to which Jim would be invited.
.
I think the stories of Ron Howard saying he hated Jim Nabors might be A.I. internet clickbait.
KAP
Another one I had to look up.
Whereas I’m no fan of the current DA, the defendant has a right to seek bail (money or bond held by the court to assure the defendant appear as directed) pursuant to the 8th Amendment.
This article is vague on how the suspects got released. Probably on purpose to spur comments. The revolving bars implies incompetence by Law Enforcement which is premature to say the least. Based on the timing, it has to be by bail. It too early in the process for the Detectives to have presented their case to the Felony Filing Deputy District Attorney for charges.
Being on bail is not a reflection of guilt, innocence or incompetence of law enforcement. It is just how the system is designed to function.
Defendants enjoy the “Presumption of Innocence” which does not mean they actually are innocent by the way. It simply means the burden of proof lies with the Government to prove criminal culpability.
Why not hold them at the county jail until their court dates then release if innocent.