Long-term exposure to low levels of traffic pollution is associated with higher health care costs for elderly residents, according to a hyper-local study recently published in the peer-reviewed journal Atmospheric Environment.
Emergency room costs were nearly $500 higher per year for the average elderly patient when nitrogen dioxide, a common traffic pollutant, was 5.9 parts per billion higher than areas with nitrogen dioxide of 4.2 parts per billion.
California considers anything above long-term exposure of 30 parts per billion to be harmful to humans. This study shows costs rising even at low levels of pollution.
“Most of these levels are below what the state considers to be harmful,” said Kaiser Permanente Division of Research scientist Stacey Alexeeff, who co-first authored the study with senior health scientist Ananya Roy with the Environmental Defense Fund.
The effects are particularly costly for heart disease patients in areas with 10.1 parts per billion of nitrogen dioxide. Total annual direct health care costs for them were 7 percent higher than for patients exposed to 4.2 parts per billion of nitrogen dioxide. Emergency room costs were 23 percent higher.
The study analyzed block-by-block pollution over two and a half years and five years of Kaiser Permanente Northern California patient health records. Researchers used pollution data collected by monitors attached to Google Street View cars.
Researchers linked the air quality data to patient addresses from more than 25,000 Kaiser members.
Roy said the increased costs at $500 per person could add significantly to Medicare costs, which were nearly $830 billion in 2020, according to Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.
“It does add up to quite a lot of money,” Roy said.
Roy suggested the research has important implications for transportation and environmental policy.
Slashing transportation emissions “are going to be vital to ensuring that we have healthy communities,” Roy said. Electric cars and trucks could be a big part of that, she suggested.
Alexeeff sees the need for policy changes too.
“I think it’s really difficult because people can’t just move” from their home easily, Alexeeff said.
The Environmental Defense Fund paid for the study.
So the stack and pack transit village artificial manufacturing of society placement of people in high density urban areas by the Marxist overseers has some negative consequences? I thought they thought this all out first. I bet they have wineries or places they own to get away from all that bad air stuff.
They should do a study on the effects of long term traffic pollution on toll collectors. They were exposed to it for at least 40 hours a week.
They did the same study some time ago to ban lead from gasoline.
They didn’t know that already?
NSDT
Our tax dollars at work.
More fear porn to justify destroying the USA economy
,as they pretend its going to save the USA.
Their smog test program is a farce as companies can pollute all day if they pay pollution credits.Wake up libs,as usual your own people are deceiving you,and you eat it up like Tide pods.
They dont care one bit about air quality..follow the money.Libs,take a math and economics and common sense class first please.
We’re dealing with some quick minds here……….
But they ruined it with the electric car pitch.
As usual, it’s just plain politics.
Don’t follow the science, follow the money.
Sip a beverage with a plastic straw in their honor……..
Well duh, a study was needed for this info?
Geez some people are so stupid..
Higher cost most likely due to the amount of people getting free healthcare. Hey someone has to pay for it.
So how much money did they spend to find out long term exposure to pollutants is bad for you…DA!
How about a study on the long term effects of media pollution. It’s apparently very damaging unless you consider it all a comedy series. 😄
The last sentence of the article says it all. Advocacy and lobbying. Beware!
…. imho more needs to be done around diesels
I believe living longer is also associated with higher health care costs
Your comment is incredibly ironic and funny.
Nice work.
Once you know who funded the study you know what the findings will be.
Works every time.
AD
Inhaling poison results in medical/health problems???
No Way!!!
Who woulda thought!!!
But don’t worry, everybody, the liberal Democrats will fix it all.
CARS BAD, TRAIN GOOD!
Bring back the Southern Pacific’s San Ramon Branch Line back, bring the Key System back, bring the Sacramento Northern line back, let us fund passenger and freight rail in this country once more and get out of our smoking choking automobiles.