Advertisement
Home » Golden Gate Bridge Protesters Released, District Attorney’s Investigation Continues

Golden Gate Bridge Protesters Released, District Attorney’s Investigation Continues

by CLAYCORD.com
17 comments

San Francisco District Attorney Brooke Jenkins said 26 people who were arrested on Monday for shutting down the Golden Gate Bridge while protesting Israel’s war in Gaza will be released without charges while an investigation into potential charges continues.

The 26 were arrested by California Highway Patrol officers after blocking traffic for several hours starting at 8:30 a.m. Monday.

They were booked on multiple misdemeanors and a potential felony conspiracy charge, but Jenkins said she was not ready to make the final charging decision before the 24-hour deadline to charge or release expired at 4 p.m. Tuesday.

“That timeline has not given the CHP enough time to complete their investigation into the 26 individuals arrested at this one event and gather all of the evidence required for us to evaluate and make proper charging decisions for each person at this time,” Jenkins said.

Advertisement

The action was part of coordinated protests in multiple cities around the nation, including in Oakland, where protesters blocked Interstate Highway 880. Protesters said they were targeting the global economy in response to the ongoing war.

Jenkins said the protest was not covered by the First Amendment.

“While we must protest avenues for free speech, the exercise of free speech cannot compromise public safety,” she said.

17 comments


Anon April 17, 2024 - 7:52 AM - 7:52 AM

First, they are impeding Commerce.
Second, meanwhile……J6 are all still Unlawfully in jail.

26
9
Rollo Tomasi April 17, 2024 - 9:29 AM - 9:29 AM

J6 prosecutors had a rough time in front of SCOTUS yesterday.

10
4
Concord Guy April 17, 2024 - 9:30 AM - 9:30 AM

J6 insurrectionists are in jail for good reason. They broke the law. They were tried and convicted. They are now paying their debt to society.

9
35
Pepe April 17, 2024 - 12:21 PM - 12:21 PM

To bad they don’t do the same to all who break the law.

20
1
Rollo Tomasi April 17, 2024 - 5:18 PM - 5:18 PM

These people broke the law too. It is unlawful to obstruct a roadway. I’m sure prosecutors will have your full support in prosecuting these criminals, correct?

NoMoreFreeRide April 18, 2024 - 9:35 AM - 9:35 AM

Great comparison to J6 quite the reach!

1
2
Dood April 17, 2024 - 8:07 AM - 8:07 AM

Who is paying for the removal of the cement filled barrels that had to be jack hammered out and any damage done to the bridge….

19
1
domo April 17, 2024 - 8:54 AM - 8:54 AM

… we taxpayers are of course

15
domo April 17, 2024 - 8:14 AM - 8:14 AM

….and as of this morning (Wednesday) no charges have been filed… how much ya wanna bet that they’ll get off scot free…. our lib prosecutors – letting them hold up tens of thousands of employees including medical emergencies, ambulances, LE, etc… disgusting

32
2
Warm Kitty April 17, 2024 - 8:22 AM - 8:22 AM

You don’t have to charge any of them, just send them ALL to Gaza.

36
2
Abe April 17, 2024 - 8:29 AM - 8:29 AM

Lady Justice must be weeping.

19
1
Badge1104 April 17, 2024 - 8:52 AM - 8:52 AM

Not enough evidence? Come on!
These protestors are loosing favor and credibility in my eyes.
Funny, we don’t hear much about the Oct 6th atrocities or hostages outrage, or the huge missel attack on Isreal the other night!
The dem controlled media is kind of hush about that.

26
1
parent April 17, 2024 - 10:49 AM - 10:49 AM

Wow … video evidence and they are still released with no charges. SF is a cess pool, a demonic waste land.

Saying that the CHP has not given over the evidence when you can see from multiple sources … seriously? What other cases do you want to throw out you uselss waste of taxpayer dollars Jenkins? Why not be honest and say you are flat out not going to charge them because you hate the police?

This attack on our local roadways was planned. It was coordinated. Could you not see that multiple roadways were blocked by these little domestic terrorists? For those of you that want to challenge the ‘deomestic terrorist’ reference, here is the definition used by all Law Enforcement Agencies in the United States, “Domestic terrorism: Violent, criminal acts committed by individuals and/or groups to further ideological goals stemming from domestic influences, such as those of a political, religious, social, racial, or environmental nature.”
Was this criminal? Yes, it was … even Jenkins said it was not protected by the 1st Amendment.
Did this attempt to further an idelogical goal? Yes, something to do with Gaza …
Will they be charged by the loser DA Jenkins, absolutley not.

16
Truth Ruth April 17, 2024 - 11:19 AM - 11:19 AM

Just release their names and mugshots and let the people who got stuck in traffic that day take care of the rest. People are fed up with this carp.

19
2
C-Mo April 17, 2024 - 11:37 AM - 11:37 AM

Make them pay for everything they caused – law enforcement deployments, employee time spent arresting, booking, and housing them, and the removal of everything they used to block traffic, at the very least.

19
Bob Kazamakis April 17, 2024 - 12:51 PM - 12:51 PM

The were not only caught in the act, but also themselves stated that they, “were targeting the global economy”. They even publicly coordinated the protests days before they happened.

Any claim that 24 hours (after the arrest) was not sufficient time to gather evidence is a bald faced lie.

Of course, I can’t really say that I’m surprised that this is how the government is handling this.

11
1
OreoooH April 17, 2024 - 7:46 PM - 7:46 PM

Go ahead and release them just give us the names. Thank you.


Comments are closed.

Advertisement

Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter!

Latest News

© Copyright 2023 Claycord News & Talk